NYC neighborhood after Hurricane Sandy |
This post is about Chicano
literature. But of necessity, it's about the rest of the humans and all human culture, too.
Word usage fascinates me,
something writers manipulate and craft in their literary works. It's not easy.
Certain words carry unintended meaning.
Two phrases, "Ecological
footprint" and "Save the Earth" have always bothered me for
their inaccuracy. The first is a measure of the demands that humans put on
Earth's ecosystems. Buying a package of junk food involves cutting trees for
the box, processing oil used to produce the plastic, the consequent landfill or
recycling needed to get rid of the trash, as well as our waste products from
eating the junk. And that's just the tip of the melting iceberg.
What about footprint? To me, it's BS. Butt-print, something wider and bigger
than a foot, would more accurately describe what our presence does to the
planet. Footprint's an understatement of our negative impact, like we won't
admit our bigger, even catastrophic, guilt.
Saving the planet sounds nice and
ecological-friendly, but it too lacks precision, in an opposite way. Many of our
ecological movements aren't so concerned about the whole planet as much as they
are about preserving it so humans can thrive. Face up: we'd sacrifice umpteen
islands and species if that paid for our continuation on top of the food chain.
350.org is a group that keeps
count for us of the first phrase, footprint. 350 means climate safety, for all gente. To keep Earth fit for humans, CO2 in the atmosphere must be below
350 parts per million (ppm).
Polar cap melt |
You don't have to be any
scientist to appreciate that the current 392ppm of CO2 means we passed the limit, live on
borrowed time. Plus, it's rising about
2ppm each year. For some years this has meant we're screwing ourselves like the
dinosaurs never did. Forget about "saving the planet"; Chicanos,
Anglos, Boricuas, vatos, Chinese, it don't matter--we're extinction toast.
A Lakota
saying fits here: The frog does not drink up the pond in which he lives, meaning
that at least in one respect, today frogs display higher I.Q.s than us. When there's no more drinkable, livable pond, the frog dies.
As a writer, I'd like there to
be great- and great-geat-grandchildren to read my writings one day. When the CO2
gets to 400 in my lifetime (knock wood), I might have to give up that
expectation. I can understand and accept that.
That reminds me of a line in an
article this week about Breezy Point, Queens, NY, a working-class beach
neighborhood leveled by oceanic flash floods of Hurricane Sandy and subsequent
fires. You can read people's accounts of the devastion, but what struck me about the residents' reactions was:
"They didn't want to
believe what was happening."
Global warming weather, 350ppm,
melting Greenland and polar ice caps, loss of polar bear habitat, rising ocean
levels--some of what President Obama described this week--seem like
abstractions, until we're directly affected by them, like Katrina and Sandy. We just don't believe. Don't believe us frogs can drink up our pond.
Obviously, there are many things
each one of us can do to get our pond back to full and livable. Below are
details about one of the most powerful
opportunities to keep our species going. But the window of that opportunity
comes quick and closes soon.
Sunday,
Feb. 17th is the Forward on Climate rallies targeted nationally for sending
President Obama one message:
Don't approve the Keystone XL Pipeline.
If
the message is powerful enough, i.e., well-attended, with one signature he can effectively prevent 700,000 barrels
of the dirtiest carbon oil on the planet going
daily from Canada to U.S. Gulf Coast
refineries. And keep pollutants from raising
the atmosphere's CO2ppm. [Read more here.] Congress doesn't approve/disapprove this because
legislation isn't involved; only the President and his staff decide. Obama has
asked for us to "push" him. If you believe that, here's one for you
to put your shoulder behind. Without that, all kids of all nationalities will have to learn how to breathe 400ppm in their much filthier pond in the near future.
You
can attend one of the demonstrations (below), send messages of support (or
money), spread the word via Facebook and other social media, E-mail, text or
call your President, congresspeople and anyone else you want to. And not stop
until the message has gotten through. We owe something to our kids, grandkids
and ourselves. Plus, there's the pond to consider.
Dozens of groups will
demonstrate tomorrow, Sunday, Feb. 17th, 2013 on the National Mall in D.C. to
take the message directly to the President. More will occur in L.A.,
Monterrey, San Francisco, San Diego, elsewhere in Calif., Chicago, Iowa,
Michigan, Minn., Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Austin, Olympia & Seattle,
Wash., and Denver, among others. Go here for details.
In Denver on Sunday, Feb. 17, at
11:30am, A student-led "Go Fossil Free" rally will beging at 11:20am,
followed by a "human pipeline" march to Civic Center Park. Starts at
the Auraria Campus' Tivoli Commons, 900 Auraria Parkway, Denver. (Please wear
all black.) It ends at Civic Center Park, 101 W. 14th Ave. Pkwy. which you can
join at 12:30pm.
If you think new jobs for us
frogs are more important than a dirtier, unlivable pond, or that a lower price for a tankful in
your butt-print car matters more than whether there'll be frogs even walking after
400ppm, you might not attend. Otherwise, I'll be joining you in some way.
Es todo, hoy, but tomorrow matters mucho más,
RudyG
BLESS ME, ULTIMA, the film opens in select markets next week on Friday, February 22nd, 2013. Go here for more info and check local listings.
carpool to the rally, or use alternative transportation modes than one person per motor.
ReplyDeletemvs
Rudy, I'm totally with you on this issue. It's not about you or me, or the present population on this globe. As our Native Americans have often stated, and believe in: Our decisions today need to be predicated on their effects SEVEN GENERATIONS AWAY. By one calculation of "generation," which is the age difference between the parent and the birth of the first child, this time can be more than 100 years away. Imagine any politician today having the vision and political will to think 100 years down the road!
ReplyDeleteBut this entire issue of environmental protection cannot be ignored or downplayed. If we the people have to make so much noise about it, and use our voting powers, we the people must be the ones who protect our planet and our future generations. I'm with you: NO ON KEYSTONE.