by Ernest Hogan
There’s something rumbling through
Scifilanda. It’s happening all over. Even here at La Bloga. Rudy
Ch. Garcia has been bringing up the Latino specfic (somebody has got
to come up with a better name, dammit!), and David Brin is concerned
about “political wrangling.”
Of course, none
of this is new. It's practically the story of my life as an ancient
Chicano scifisista who came of age in the New Wave/Dangerous Visions
era. We had What If? And If This Goes On . . . but with the world
tuning in, turning on, and dropping out, and running riot with all
kinds of brave new strangness, it just seemed natural for speculative
fiction to explore all kinds of new political possibilities.
Before that, just about every low
budget sci-fi flick I watched on shows like KHJ-TV's Strange Tales of
Science Fiction began with a prologue that explained that with atom
bombs and space exploration, things people couldn't dare imagine a
few years ago were today's headlines. Even Plan 9 From Outer
Space's trailer explained that
Tor Johnson and Vampira rising from their graves were the shape of
things to come. The connection with our current reality has always
made science fiction seem relevant, and flirted with the political.
And why not?
Politics is the business of making and selling alternate realities.
That's what Fox News does, so does the Daily Show. The same for
Greenpeace and ISIS. And your friendly neighborhood politicians, no
matter what party they belong to. You get more people buying into
your alternate reality, actual reality starts looking more like
it.
In science fiction
they call it world building. How do you build a world without dealing
with political issues?
Throughout my
career I've had to deal with those who don't want any nasty, old
political commentary in their sci-fi. They think it should all be
“pure” entertainment. Oh, for the nonpartisan, orgasmic joy of
exploding spaceships and disintegrating nonhuman enemies!
But then, who decides who the enemies are? And just who are you calling nonhuman?
What if your
participation in any kind of future depends on the world being
changed?
Of
course, when Star Wars
was marketed as “A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away” the
consumers were delighted to have sci-fi reconfigured in “pure”
entertainment. As the juggernaut franchise took off, politics was
pushed out of science fiction as being bad for business.
People said a lot
of strange things in those days. Nothing sci-fi had ever been this
popular. Looking back, it was just that they took old fashioned
melodrama and dressed it up in new spacey fashions, but in those days
strange theories abounded. A lot of people liked the fact that they
didn't have to think, just sit back and enjoy it. No controversy.
Nothing to disturb the fun.
Then a few
spoilsports mentioned that all the people in the movie were white.
Fans and critics
shot this down when ever it came up: “No, no! That was one of the
things that made the movie so enjoyable! One black or brown face
would have ruined my pleasure! Besides, that's not Earth, it's
another galaxy! George Lucas is such a genius!”
But Lucas hadn't really invented
anything. Some of us at the fringes of speculative fiction were
complaining that most of it seemed to take place in an all-white
universe, as if there was some secret plan for planetary ethnic
cleansing that would make the world a Klansman's utopia by the year
2000. We were crying out for alternatives. I was seeking them out,
reading them, and writing them.
Not much progress has been made, if you
consider how long we've been struggling.
I don't think
there is such a thing as “pure” entertainment. Even in a simple
tale of good guys versus bad guys, you have to decide which side
you're on. I've seen enough pulp entertainment from different
cultures to realize what is possible. No matter who you are, you are
a “bad” guy, or an alien to someone else.
Specfic has always
been a good way to get out of your point of view, and see what it's
like to be someone else, walk a few mile in their moccasins, so to
speak. The world would be better if we all did that more often.
For decades I've
been dreaming of a global cultural explosion in which we'd see science
fiction of all kinds, from all cultures and points of view. Not
political wrangling, but an orgy of possibilities. Not just futures,
but other realities. That's what our imaginative genres are supposed
to be about, but they rarely achieve it.
We're getting
close in this age of Afrofuturism, Chicanonautica, Transhumanism, and
new movements that are emerging as you read this. I think Latino
specfic will lead the way, because all the peoples who are Latino are
more diverse than the Anglos.
So, to What If? and
If This Goes On . . . we should add Why Not?
Ernest Hogan lives and works in
several universes at the same time. Manifestations will be appearing
near you soon. Meanwhile, please support Caravana 43: USA Tour of Families of the Missing Ayotzinapa Students.
Great post. I like you in my universe.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Mario.
ReplyDeleteGood post, Nesto.
ReplyDelete"How do you build a world without dealing with political issues?" No es posible, as you point out.
I also believe Latinos "might lead the way." Mestizaje implies that.
BTW, I call it spec-lit, with a hyphen, as in speculative literature. Actually, I prefer fabulist mextasy, but that's another discussion. - RudyG, a.k.a. Rudy Ch. Garcia, Chicano spec-lit author of fabulist mextasy.
The battle over the terminology will go on, Rudy, and probably won't be decided by us writers -- but we can keep throwing out our suggestions. Meanwhile, we need to keep writing amazing stuff.
ReplyDeleteErnesto, no importa terminology. What matters, is more than "suggestions"; we are obligated to create new ondas, waves, as you do. Simón, by our "writing amazing stuff." A lo menos, I'm tratando.
ReplyDeleteRudyG