by Ernest Hogan
“Painting
is not done to decorate apartments. It is an instrument of war for
attack and defense against the enemy.” Pablo Picasso said it. The
hero of my novel Cortez on Jupiter had it tattooed on
his arm.
After all, art is a weapon, especially in our Information Age. The
same can be said for cartooning.
As
a cartoonist myself, news of the attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, and the
deaths of twelve people including some of the cartoonists, hit close to home.
It was especially disturbing that the gunmen were offended by
blasphemous cartoons.
When trying to explain what I do (it's always difficult) I like to
call it creative blasphemy. Science fiction works when I try to put
it into the context of our consumer society, but creative blasphemy
is more accurate, and explains when I deviate from the traditional
norms of sci-fi.
I'm aware of the trouble it can bring. I've got the scars. But I keep
doing it. I can't help it. It's who and what I am.
I
understand why the Charlie
Hebdo cartoonists drew
Muhammad even though Muslims consider it blasphemy. There is something
about doing the forbidden. I've gone there myself.
There
was an uneasy moment when I was reading the contract for the British
edition of High Aztech.
There was a blaphemy clause. I was supposed to assure them that the
book was not blasphemous, when blasphemy was what I had in mind when I wrote it. Luckily, on closer reading I realized that they meant blasphemy
against the Church of England – I never even mention the C of E in
the novel! Funny how people don't care if you blaspheme against
someone else's religion.
Nobody
tried to kill me for writing High
Aztech. They just tried
to kill my career. New York still treats me like a talented leper.
I
wouldn't draw a cartoon of Muhammad. Not that I'm afraid of
terrorists killing me, but because I know Muslims. I help them at the
library where I work, which is down the freeway from the local
mosque. And on my side of town, hijabs are a common sight. I've met a
lot of nice Muslims. I wouldn't want to insult them.
You
have to watch out for collateral damage when weaponizing your art. As
Chester Himes said “. . . all unorganized violence is like a
blind man with a pistol.” We all need to keep our eyes open.
Also, since there's been a ban on images of Muhammad for centuries,
nobody really knows what he looked like. My guess would be that he
looked a lot like Jesus – the real one, not the blond marketing
logo that the churches of Europe have sold the world. It may be the
reason for the image ban.
Hell, it would make a great cartoon:
“Great Jesus T-shirt, dude!”
“It's Muhammad!”
Wouldn't have to draw the forbidden image in either.
But
I don't think The
New Yorker
would buy it.
When cartoonists draw Muhammad, he ends up being a typical
stereotypical Arab with a beard, big nose, and a turban. Switch the
turban for a sombrero, shave the beard, leave a moustache, and he
become a stereotypical Mexican. I'm often mistaken for an Arab, which
can be dangerous in Arizona.
But then, cartooning is all about stereotypes. The difference comes
in what you do with them.
It's too easy to insult murderous fanatics. Just fling a handy cliché
and run. Hope you run fast enough.
Looking
at the Charlie
Hebdo
cartoons, dispite their professed far-left agenda, they appeal to
racism and xenophobia. Are there any non-white cartoonists on their
staff? Any Muslims? Or Jews?
I've heard that these days in Paris, all the service jobs are filled
by black people. It must be like being on a plantation in the Deep
South before the Civil War. And more and more Arabs live in the
suburbs. France is turning black and brown. Afrofuturism, mes amis.
I wonder who's laughing at these cartoons? People whose Parisian
apartments are decorated with Picassos?
The
surviving Charlie
Hebdo
cartoonists would do better if they targeted the minds of terrorists,
not just confirming all their fears about Western civilization. Do
some trickster clown televoodoo. Can you make them laugh? Breakdown
their ridgid thinking, and invade their beliefs with alien images and
ideas? Let's infect them with out mind-altering viruses!
Stépane Charbonnier, (AKA “Charb”) one of the murdered
cartoonists said, “I'd rather die standing up than live on my
knees.” He's now being quoted all over the interwebs.
He may have been quoting Emiliano Zapata, who said, “It is better
to die on your feet than to live on your knees.” ¡Viva la
Revoluçión!
Or
should I say, steal this wisdom. Which reminds me of the words of
Abbie Hoffman: “Free
speech means the right to shout 'theater' in a crowded fire.”
Such theater. Such
a crowded fire.
Ernest Hogan is
addicted to creative blasphemy. It oozes out of his works. Your
preconceptions are risk.
5 comments:
Ernesto - I've never seen the actual mag so I can't say much about the overall content of Charlie Hebdo. But it does seem to be an equal opportunity offender, meaning that it blasphemes everyone. Here's a link to Charlie cartoons that take on racists, racial profiling, and militarization of the police.
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/01/11/1357057/-The-Charlie-Hebdo-cartoons-no-one-is-showing-you
Thanks for the link, Manuel, but like I said, it's not enough to offend.
Here's another good analysis: http://www.vox.com/2015/1/12/7518349/charlie-hebdo-racist
Chicanonautica!? You have offended my Mexican-Chicano sensibilities!! Jihad!!! Great post!! I am forwarding it to all my friends (all 3 of them)
Thank you, yanquigrande, that's the kind of jihad I can get behind.
Post a Comment